z3x tech care group

McKinsey Matrix Tool

Strategic portfolio analysis

EN / PL

Evaluate market attractiveness and competitive strength

Configure your business units and define weighting criteria for deep portfolio assessment.

Evaluated Items

check_circle

Core SaaS Product

Market: 4.2 • Strength: 4.5

chevron_right

Enterprise Services

Market: 3.1 • Strength: 2.8

chevron_right

Market Attractiveness Criteria

Market Size
W: 40% Score: 4
Profitability
W: 60% Score: 3

Competitive Strength Criteria

Brand Strength
W: 50% Score: 5
Product Quality
W: 50% Score: 4

GE/McKinsey 9-box Matrix

Market Attractiveness

Invest
CS
Grow
Selective
Grow
Selective
ES
Harvest
Selective
Harvest
Divest

Competitive Strength

Invest & Grow
Selective Strategy
Harvest / Divest

Core SaaS Product

Strategic Recommendation: Invest & Grow

Aggregated Score

4.35

Market Attractiveness

4.2 / 5.0

Competitive Strength

4.5 / 5.0

Strategic Interpretation

The business unit holds a leadership position in a highly attractive market. Resources should be prioritized here to defend current market share and explore expansion into adjacent segments. Aggressive R&D investment is recommended to maintain the high competitive strength score against emerging SaaS competitors.